Market Facilitation Program (MFP) in Saint Francis County, Arkansas, 2019

Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 332

Recipients of Market Facilitation Program (MFP) from farms in Saint Francis County, Arkansas totaled $17,205,000 in in 2019.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Market Facilitation Program (MFP)
2019
1Trail PartnershipWidener, AR 72394$1,000,000
2S And L Farms PartnershipMarion, AR 72364$527,398
3D & D Gore FarmPalestine, AR 72372$502,460
4G & L FarmsHughes, AR 72348$500,000
5B & G Farm PartnershipHeth, AR 72346$451,892
6Heritage Farms PartnershipForrest City, AR 72336$407,937
7Whittenton Farms PartnershipForrest City, AR 72335$407,662
8Lindsey Bros PartnershipForrest City, AR 72335$368,135
9Ryan Carey FarmMarion, AR 72364$362,970
10Fnb Of Eastern Arkansas **Forrest City, AR 72335$346,708
11Keeling Farms Family PartnershipColt, AR 72326$340,606
12Mcdaniel FarmsForrest City, AR 72335$328,911
13Jessland PlantationForrest City, AR 72335$328,533
14R & V Hall PartnershipPalestine, AR 72372$320,816
15Forrwin Farms PartnershipWynne, AR 72396$315,967
16Carey Farms PartnerhsipForrest City, AR 72335$295,580
17Bart Haven FarmsForrest City, AR 72335$283,608
18Caleb Jones FarmsPalestine, AR 72372$276,295
19Brian Mcdaniel Farms PartnershipForrest City, AR 72335$274,167
20Farm Services Agency **Washington, DC 20250$273,928

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag