Water Bank Program in Saint Francis County, Arkansas, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 68
Recipients of Water Bank Program from farms in Saint Francis County, Arkansas totaled $45,420 in from 1995-2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Water Bank Program 1995-2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Stephens Group Incorporated | Little Rock, AR 72201 | $4,394 |
| 2 | Cocoa Slough Ltd | Little Rock, AR 72212 | $2,289 |
| 3 | Mary Varvil | Forrest City, AR 72336 | $1,981 |
| 4 | John Drury | Colt, AR 72326 | $1,855 |
| 5 | Edward P Hammons | Forrest City, AR 72336 | $1,786 |
| 6 | Donahue Co Inc %walter Sandusky | Memphis, TN 38119 | $1,503 |
| 7 | Ida B Lindsey Estate | Caldwell, AR 72322 | $1,443 |
| 8 | Eric J Rogers III | Jordan, AR 72519 | $1,406 |
| 9 | His Farm Inc | Fayetteville, AR 72703 | $1,361 |
| 10 | V Snowden Armstrong | Cincinnati, OH 45246 | $1,278 |
| 11 | Rosia Davis | Forrest City, AR 72336 | $1,234 |
| 12 | Brenda S Gammill | Dallas, TX 75240 | $1,167 |
| 13 | Shelia Sweet Mcguire Estate | Forrest City, AR 72335 | $1,167 |
| 14 | Lockhart Sweet Jr | Dallas, TX 75240 | $1,166 |
| 15 | Joseph 0 Dunn | Hot Springs, AR 71914 | $1,160 |
| 16 | Martha S Gandy | Forrest City, AR 72335 | $1,150 |
| 17 | Estate Of Webb Sweet | Forrest City, AR 72335 | $1,150 |
| 18 | Marjorie S Walker | Birmingham, AL 35213 | $1,149 |
| 19 | Languille Farms General Partnersh | Forrest City, AR 72335 | $1,056 |
| 20 | Circle E Farms Inc | Wynne, AR 72396 | $1,044 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf