Emergency Conservation Program in California, 2020
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 120
Recipients of Emergency Conservation Program from farms in California totaled $4,247,000 in in 2020.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Emergency Conservation Program 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Santa Paula Hay & Grain And Ranch | Oak View, CA 93022 | $241,806 |
| 2 | Hemphill Ranch Inc | Tulelake, CA 96134 | $227,542 |
| 3 | Robert A Byrne Co | Malin, OR 97632 | $215,270 |
| 4 | Joe Egan | Janesville, CA 96114 | $212,870 |
| 5 | Steve Declerck | Yreka, CA 96097 | $200,000 |
| 6 | Rancho Canada Larga | Ventura, CA 93001 | $197,410 |
| 7 | R H Smith Family Properties | Ventura, CA 93002 | $197,354 |
| 8 | Rincon Creek Ranch LLC | Oak Park, CA 91377 | $142,944 |
| 9 | Mission Livestock Management | Dixon, CA 95620 | $138,403 |
| 10 | Jeanette Marie Lemos | Hornbrook, CA 96044 | $123,448 |
| 11 | Grass Lands Property LLC | Livermore, CA 94551 | $123,176 |
| 12 | Col Family 2005 Revocable Trust | Merced, CA 95340 | $107,121 |
| 13 | David G Carrion | Esparto, CA 95627 | $92,401 |
| 14 | Del Cielo LLC | Ventura, CA 93001 | $91,261 |
| 15 | Richard Egan | Susanville, CA 96130 | $86,608 |
| 16 | John O Varian | Parkfield, CA 93451 | $74,536 |
| 17 | Ocean Breeze Ranch LLC | Bonsall, CA 92003 | $68,951 |
| 18 | Sean Luffy | Mariposa, CA 95338 | $67,398 |
| 19 | Kenneth Moholt -siebert | Santa Rosa, CA 95403 | $63,370 |
| 20 | James Eddie | Potter Valley, CA 95469 | $62,323 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf