Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 in California, 2020
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 14,820
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 from farms in California totaled $996,401,000 in in 2020.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 2020 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Buttonwillow Land And Cattle Co | Buttonwillow, CA 93206 | $1,955,850 |
2 | Tri Iest Dairy | Madera, CA 93637 | $1,500,000 |
3 | Fortune Farming 1 | Cantua Creek, CA 93608 | $1,000,000 |
4 | Errotabere Ranches | Riverdale, CA 93656 | $1,000,000 |
5 | Alamo Farms | Keyes, CA 95328 | $1,000,000 |
6 | Wallace Brothers | Sutter, CA 95982 | $1,000,000 |
7 | Tally Ho Farms Partnership Dba Walker Brothers | Merrill, OR 97633 | $1,000,000 |
8 | Santa Paula Hay & Grain And Ranch | Oak View, CA 93022 | $1,000,000 |
9 | Lester Neufeld & Son | Wasco, CA 93280 | $972,126 |
10 | Airoso Dairy | Tipton, CA 93272 | $873,645 |
11 | Terra Linda Farms I | Riverdale, CA 93656 | $752,383 |
12 | M & K Farms | Tulare, CA 93275 | $750,000 |
13 | Four J Farms | Tipton, CA 93272 | $750,000 |
14 | A-bar Ag Enterprises | Firebaugh, CA 93622 | $750,000 |
15 | Mariani Nut Co Inc | Winters, CA 95694 | $750,000 |
16 | Coburn Ranch | Dos Palos, CA 93620 | $750,000 |
17 | Costa Farms Inc | Soledad, CA 93960 | $750,000 |
18 | Anthony Vineyards Inc | Bakersfield, CA 93389 | $750,000 |
19 | Mattos Bros L P | Hanford, CA 93230 | $750,000 |
20 | West-star North Dairy | Buttonwillow, CA 93206 | $750,000 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>