Non-insured Disaster Assistance in California, 2020
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 30
Recipients of Non-insured Disaster Assistance from farms in California totaled $699,000 in in 2020.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Non-insured Disaster Assistance 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Morrison Chopping LLC | Rohnert Park, CA 94927 | $117,625 |
| 2 | Natures Best Farms Inc | Yorba Linda, CA 92886 | $108,302 |
| 3 | Domingo Mora | Reedley, CA 93654 | $89,154 |
| 4 | Sonia Mora | Reedley, CA 93654 | $89,154 |
| 5 | Aulakh Farms Inc | Kerman, CA 93630 | $73,721 |
| 6 | Santiago M Santillan | Santa Maria, CA 93458 | $43,031 |
| 7 | Lourdes Santillan | Santa Maria, CA 93458 | $43,031 |
| 8 | Schene Enterprises Inc | Dixon, CA 95620 | $24,111 |
| 9 | Jack W Brown | Potter Valley, CA 95469 | $16,224 |
| 10 | James Guntly II | Ukiah, CA 95482 | $13,309 |
| 11 | Robert Foster | Oroville, CA 95965 | $12,097 |
| 12 | James Eddie | Potter Valley, CA 95469 | $11,067 |
| 13 | Romeo Mangrubang | Los Osos, CA 93402 | $10,623 |
| 14 | Humberto De La Paz | Grover Beach, CA 93483 | $10,565 |
| 15 | Matilda J Robinson | Witter Springs, CA 95493 | $7,786 |
| 16 | Walter Niesen | Willits, CA 95490 | $4,148 |
| 17 | Douglas Parker | Williams, CA 95987 | $4,099 |
| 18 | Massa And Sons Inc | Willows, CA 95988 | $3,200 |
| 19 | Ricardo Camacho | Los Osos, CA 93402 | $2,706 |
| 20 | Farm Services Agency ** | Washington, DC 20250 | $2,281 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf