CCC Organic Programs in California, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 41
Recipients of CCC Organic Programs from farms in California totaled $30,344 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | CCC Organic Programs 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Edible Endeavors Nursery | Palo Cedro, CA 96073 | $631 |
22 | Maria F Silveira | Orland, CA 95963 | $598 |
23 | Edgar Fernando Mendoza Samaniego | King City, CA 93930 | $551 |
24 | Double A Walnuts | Forestville, CA 95436 | $550 |
25 | Tangut Corporation Dba Puredia Corporation | Irvine, CA 92618 | $550 |
26 | Daphne Nixon | Carmel, CA 93922 | $546 |
27 | Sutton Brothers | Maxwell, CA 95955 | $500 |
28 | Sage View Inc | Poway, CA 92064 | $500 |
29 | Margaret Patricia Couch | Carpinteria, CA 93013 | $500 |
30 | Conner Jay Hartman | Malin, OR 97632 | $500 |
31 | Hayden O'donnell Dba Goodie Farms | Cherry Valley, CA 92223 | $500 |
32 | Richgrove Packers Dba Richgrove Company | Riverside, CA 92502 | $500 |
33 | Zephyr Mountain Grove Inc | Wildomar, CA 92595 | $500 |
34 | Alovitox Inc. | Lake Forest, CA 92630 | $500 |
35 | Petaluma Livestock Auction Yard Inc | Petaluma, CA 94975 | $500 |
36 | National Custom Packing, Inc. | Castroville, CA 95012 | $500 |
37 | Inn Foods Inc. | Watsonville, CA 95076 | $500 |
38 | Vertascent | Santa Rosa, CA 95401 | $500 |
39 | Diane K Rucker | Ukiah, CA 95482 | $419 |
40 | Alejandro Ceballos | Hollister, CA 95023 | $263 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”