CCC Organic Programs in California, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 155
Recipients of CCC Organic Programs from farms in California totaled $189,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | CCC Organic Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Ronald E Wilson Dba Diamond W Dairy Ranch | Petaluma, CA 94952 | $7,106 |
2 | Arrowhead Co | Colusa, CA 95932 | $6,522 |
3 | Jlt Ranch | Petaluma, CA 94954 | $6,419 |
4 | Coelho Dairy | Modesto, CA 95357 | $4,800 |
5 | Mazzetta Dairy | Petaluma, CA 94952 | $4,250 |
6 | Gerald Spaletta Dairy | Petaluma, CA 94975 | $4,250 |
7 | Bianchini Inc | Point Reyes Station, CA 94956 | $3,976 |
8 | Christopher Twisselman | Shandon, CA 93461 | $3,829 |
9 | E & M Deniz Dairy | Petaluma, CA 94954 | $3,795 |
10 | Protector Brewery LLC | San Diego, CA 92126 | $3,750 |
11 | Penny Newman Grain Co, Inc. | Fresno, CA 93725 | $3,575 |
12 | Morrison Bros Dairy | Santa Rosa, CA 95407 | $3,000 |
13 | , | $2,785 | |
14 | Natures Best Farms Inc | Yorba Linda, CA 92886 | $2,519 |
15 | James Mcisaac | Novato, CA 94947 | $2,250 |
16 | Spaletta Ranch | Petaluma, CA 94952 | $2,250 |
17 | Larry Hirahara | Madera, CA 93637 | $2,142 |
18 | John A Mattos Jr | Petaluma, CA 94952 | $2,114 |
19 | Spaletta Dairy | Point Reyes Station, CA 94956 | $2,043 |
20 | Mcclure Dairy Inc | Inverness, CA 94937 | $2,036 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>