Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 in Butte County, California, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 440
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 from farms in Butte County, California totaled $5,859,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | William R Pritchard Family Ltd Ptshp | Davis, CA 95616 | $31,422 |
42 | Ann B. Montgomery Farms Lp | Chico, CA 95928 | $31,055 |
43 | Charles Sheppard Farms | Biggs, CA 95917 | $31,040 |
44 | Starkey Farms | Oroville, CA 95965 | $31,014 |
45 | Arthur Cummings | Chico, CA 95927 | $30,674 |
46 | Sukhjinder Bains | Live Oak, CA 95953 | $30,464 |
47 | Valley Farms | Live Oak, CA 95953 | $28,666 |
48 | Meyer Ranch Partners, LLC | Gridley, CA 95948 | $28,463 |
49 | Tres Picos | Redding, CA 96099 | $28,125 |
50 | Jason Justeson | Gridley, CA 95948 | $25,966 |
51 | Paiva Berryhill Ptshp | Chico, CA 95973 | $24,747 |
52 | Lavy Brothers | Biggs, CA 95917 | $24,218 |
53 | Dustin D Fleming | Gridley, CA 95948 | $22,598 |
54 | Csu Chico Research Foundation | Chico, CA 95928 | $22,534 |
55 | Sohnrey Ranches Inc | Durham, CA 95938 | $22,309 |
56 | Storm Farming Co | Gridley, CA 95948 | $21,958 |
57 | Nichols Ranch Partnership | Chico, CA 95928 | $21,737 |
58 | Mcpherrin Farming | Biggs, CA 95917 | $21,722 |
59 | Philip L. Wilson And Barbara I. Wilson Family Trus | Chico, CA 95973 | $21,113 |
60 | B & E Lundberg | Richvale, CA 95974 | $20,987 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”