Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 in Butte County, California, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 440
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 from farms in Butte County, California totaled $5,859,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | C F Koehnen & Sons Orchards | Glenn, CA 95943 | $387,603 |
2 | Farmers International Inc | Chico, CA 95973 | $253,556 |
3 | Dos Arboles Inc | Chico, CA 95973 | $250,000 |
4 | Pine Creek Ranch | Durham, CA 95938 | $192,431 |
5 | Roger Jack Lapant | Durham, CA 95938 | $143,394 |
6 | Jbi LLC | Zephyr Cove, NV 89448 | $131,243 |
7 | Davit Management, LLC. | Yuba City, CA 95991 | $120,537 |
8 | Melbay Farms | Yuba City, CA 95992 | $100,618 |
9 | West Chico Properties Dba Hula Nut Company | Biggs, CA 95917 | $99,634 |
10 | Sohnrey And Son Family Farm | Durham, CA 95938 | $96,040 |
11 | Caswell Farms | Durham, CA 95938 | $90,838 |
12 | Gorrill Land Company | Durham, CA 95938 | $90,641 |
13 | Robert Matthew Vanella | Chico, CA 95928 | $86,092 |
14 | Sohnrey Brothers Enterprises LLC | Oroville, CA 95965 | $77,908 |
15 | Darrel Parsley | Chico, CA 95973 | $75,624 |
16 | James Paiva Jr | Chico, CA 95973 | $69,722 |
17 | A. S. Kalkat Farming | Gridley, CA 95948 | $69,391 |
18 | Clinton W Moffitt/ Clinton & Gail Moffitt Trust | Biggs, CA 95917 | $63,991 |
19 | Archer Ranch LLC | Chico, CA 95927 | $63,699 |
20 | Bremner Farms | Chico, CA 95928 | $63,021 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>