Emergency Conservation Program in Calaveras County, California, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 45
Recipients of Emergency Conservation Program from farms in Calaveras County, California totaled $806,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Emergency Conservation Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Robert L Shinkle | Mountain Ranch, CA 95246 | $11,457 |
22 | Kevin Locke | Murphys, CA 95247 | $10,474 |
23 | Keith Hafley | Valley Springs, CA 95252 | $9,931 |
24 | Leland Fischer | Mokelumne Hill, CA 95245 | $8,400 |
25 | Mark Mathre | San Andreas, CA 95249 | $8,105 |
26 | Sandi Young | Mountain Ranch, CA 95246 | $8,101 |
27 | Lenn F Nicholson | Mountain Ranch, CA 95246 | $7,612 |
28 | Patricia J Morales | Mountain Ranch, CA 95246 | $7,201 |
29 | Gary Rose | San Andreas, CA 95249 | $5,815 |
30 | Steve Leiga | Mountain Ranch, CA 95246 | $5,637 |
31 | William Stark | Angels Camp, CA 95222 | $5,635 |
32 | Albert D Zahniser | Mokelumne Hill, CA 95245 | $5,508 |
33 | Judy D Weddle | San Andreas, CA 95249 | $5,508 |
34 | Frederick J Dodge | Mountain Ranch, CA 95246 | $4,729 |
35 | Karl Wiebe | San Andreas, CA 95249 | $4,011 |
36 | Jane Henning Childress | Mokelumne Hill, CA 95245 | $3,559 |
37 | Sarah J Hart | Mokelumne Hill, CA 95245 | $3,404 |
38 | John Dominic De Angelis | Mountain Ranch, CA 95246 | $2,783 |
39 | Karen L Lucas-malotte | Mountain Ranch, CA 95246 | $2,220 |
40 | Gary B Porteous | Sutter Creek, CA 95685 | $2,185 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”