Emergency Conservation Program in Calaveras County, California, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 45
Recipients of Emergency Conservation Program from farms in Calaveras County, California totaled $792,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Emergency Conservation Program 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Eloise Fischer | Valley Springs, CA 95252 | $127,332 |
2 | Virginia Franklin | Mokelumne Hill, CA 95245 | $72,610 |
3 | Robert Ray | Santa Barbara, CA 93101 | $49,313 |
4 | Whiskey Slide Ranch Family Lp | Walnut Creek, CA 94596 | $48,448 |
5 | Mattley Dell Orto | Mokelumne Hill, CA 95245 | $30,272 |
6 | Barbi Brown | Rail Road Flat, CA 95248 | $29,777 |
7 | Laurie A Bishopp | Mountain Ranch, CA 95246 | $27,937 |
8 | J W Dell Orto | Mokelumne Hill, CA 95245 | $27,369 |
9 | Rich Gulch Ranch Inc | Mokelumne Hill, CA 95245 | $26,306 |
10 | John V Tiscornia | San Andreas, CA 95249 | $24,306 |
11 | Douglas George Bowman | Santa Rosa, CA 95401 | $23,595 |
12 | Glenn Nakagawa | San Andreas, CA 95249 | $23,175 |
13 | Keiko Nakagawa | San Andreas, CA 95249 | $23,175 |
14 | Robert Garamendi | Mokelumne Hill, CA 95245 | $22,007 |
15 | Charles Allured | Mokelumne Hill, CA 95245 | $21,089 |
16 | Merle Fischer | Mokelumne Hill, CA 95245 | $20,947 |
17 | Michael D Fischer Jr | Valley Springs, CA 95252 | $18,339 |
18 | Gail M Mcclain | Pleasanton, CA 94588 | $16,495 |
19 | Hans A Zumbach | Angels Camp, CA 95221 | $15,662 |
20 | Douglas H Joses | Mountain Ranch, CA 95246 | $14,643 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>