Total Commodity Programs in Colusa County, California, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 623
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Colusa County, California totaled $7,540,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Judith A Steidlmayer | Napa, CA 94558 | $20,227 |
82 | Wallace Brothers | Sutter, CA 95982 | $20,176 |
83 | Sutton Brothers | Maxwell, CA 95955 | $19,988 |
84 | Clarke Ornbaun | Arbuckle, CA 95912 | $19,956 |
85 | Entremont Vineyards LLC | Arbuckle, CA 95912 | $19,227 |
86 | Richard O'sullivan 2018 Separate Prop Tr O'sulliva | Williams, CA 95987 | $18,998 |
87 | Jake & Terry Kalfsbeek | Arbuckle, CA 95912 | $18,956 |
88 | N & M Farms Inc | Sacramento, CA 95825 | $18,910 |
89 | Lzd Farms | Maxwell, CA 95955 | $18,527 |
90 | Richard & Brenda Richter | Maxwell, CA 95955 | $18,527 |
91 | Wescott Ranch LLC | Colusa, CA 95932 | $18,507 |
92 | Linda Rominger Terry | Napa, CA 94558 | $18,498 |
93 | Arnolds Joint Venture | Colusa, CA 95932 | $18,252 |
94 | Elias Ortiz | Williams, CA 95987 | $17,957 |
95 | South Lake Group Inc | Fremont, NE 68025 | $17,261 |
96 | Wilson Bend Farms | Knights Landing, CA 95645 | $16,926 |
97 | Ken Lagrande | Williams, CA 95987 | $16,705 |
98 | Gary Eugene Cain | Arbuckle, CA 95912 | $16,594 |
99 | Frank A Rogers Jr | Colusa, CA 95932 | $16,576 |
100 | Matthew J Lagrande | Williams, CA 95987 | $16,470 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”