Total Commodity Programs in Colusa County, California, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 623
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Colusa County, California totaled $7,540,000 in in 2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Halbert W Charter | Arbuckle, CA 95912 | $220,741 |
| 2 | Canal Farms | Maxwell, CA 95955 | $213,498 |
| 3 | Colusa Indian Community Economic Development Corpo | Colusa, CA 95932 | $204,682 |
| 4 | Samuel & Sarah Reynolds | Williams, CA 95987 | $201,040 |
| 5 | John Paul Peterson Trust | Chico, CA 95927 | $196,166 |
| 6 | Amy Sue Peterson Trust | Chico, CA 95927 | $196,166 |
| 7 | Michael Andrew Peterson Trust | Chico, CA 95927 | $196,166 |
| 8 | Frank J & Juanita Nobriga Living Trust Nobriga | Arbuckle, CA 95912 | $193,629 |
| 9 | King Golden State Orchards LLC | Colusa, CA 95932 | $187,587 |
| 10 | James Daniel Peterson Trust | Chico, CA 95927 | $178,905 |
| 11 | Strain Farming Company Lp | Arbuckle, CA 95912 | $128,008 |
| 12 | Bar M Cattle Co | Maxwell, CA 95955 | $117,989 |
| 13 | V & R Investments | Williams, CA 95987 | $100,997 |
| 14 | Peter D Peterson | Chico, CA 95927 | $100,265 |
| 15 | Patricia Peterson | Chico, CA 95927 | $100,265 |
| 16 | Kathy L Ferguson | Cottonwood, CA 96022 | $96,365 |
| 17 | Chamisal Creek Ranch LLC | Arbuckle, CA 95912 | $83,106 |
| 18 | M & R Lagrande | Williams, CA 95987 | $80,420 |
| 19 | Bradford Family Limited Partnership | Arbuckle, CA 95912 | $77,478 |
| 20 | Sean V Doherty Farms | Dunnigan, CA 95937 | $77,354 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf