Total Commodity Programs in Colusa County, California, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 3,169
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Colusa County, California totaled $814,355,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Canal Farms | Maxwell, CA 95955 | $10,227,406 |
2 | Colusa Indian Community Council | Colusa, CA 95932 | $8,569,074 |
3 | S B & L La Grande | Williams, CA 95987 | $8,042,283 |
4 | Chrisman Farms | Williams, CA 95987 | $6,926,460 |
5 | Boeger Land Company | Gridley, CA 95948 | $5,666,134 |
6 | Sutton Brothers | Maxwell, CA 95955 | $4,971,544 |
7 | J T & K Kalfsbeek | Arbuckle, CA 95912 | $4,742,856 |
8 | H & A Andreotti | Colusa, CA 95932 | $4,701,650 |
9 | Southam Joint Venture | Butte City, CA 95920 | $4,635,367 |
10 | Emerald Farms LLC | Maxwell, CA 95955 | $4,371,396 |
11 | J & R Farming | Grimes, CA 95950 | $4,239,112 |
12 | Baker Creek Farming | Colusa, CA 95932 | $4,188,341 |
13 | Wilson Bend Farms | Knights Landing, CA 94645 | $3,834,219 |
14 | T&p Farms | Arbuckle, CA 95912 | $3,807,346 |
15 | Robert L Wallace Irrv Trust | Arbuckle, CA 95912 | $3,608,195 |
16 | G L & M Lagrande | Williams, CA 95987 | $3,590,168 |
17 | Vann Brothers | Williams, CA 95987 | $3,566,029 |
18 | David M Bell Farms | Maxwell, CA 95955 | $3,560,193 |
19 | Keller And Keller Partnership | Colusa, CA 95932 | $3,498,546 |
20 | Mark & Sandy Ottenwalter | Colusa, CA 95932 | $3,451,878 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>