Livestock Forage Disaster Program in Colusa County, California, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 34
Recipients of Livestock Forage Disaster Program from farms in Colusa County, California totaled $934,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Livestock Forage Disaster Program 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Paul And Jeralyn K Favero Revocable Trust | Sacramento, CA 95864 | $102,472 |
2 | Douglas Parker | Williams, CA 95987 | $99,725 |
3 | Judy Parker | Williams, CA 95987 | $99,725 |
4 | Ryan Fitzpatrick | Paso Robles, CA 93447 | $68,098 |
5 | Lazy A Cattle Company | Williams, CA 95987 | $56,302 |
6 | One Bar Livestock LLC | Williams, CA 95987 | $55,798 |
7 | Ralphs Ranches Inc | Fall River Mills, CA 96028 | $46,486 |
8 | Jim Keegan | Williams, CA 95987 | $40,125 |
9 | Gilliland Livestock Inc | Davis, CA 95618 | $37,152 |
10 | Nathan A Rubini | Stonyford, CA 95979 | $32,340 |
11 | Black Rock Cattle LLC | Glenn, CA 95943 | $31,833 |
12 | Julie Dunlap | Williams, CA 95987 | $31,042 |
13 | Jc Allen Niesen | Gerber, CA 96035 | $27,031 |
14 | David Brandenberger | Stonyford, CA 95979 | $23,786 |
15 | Gerald G Kresge | Alturas, CA 96101 | $22,847 |
16 | Bar M Cattle Co | Maxwell, CA 95955 | $20,858 |
17 | Virginia Holzapfel | Willows, CA 95988 | $18,557 |
18 | Herbert R Holzapfel | Willows, CA 95988 | $18,557 |
19 | Mark Campbell | Klamath Falls, OR 97603 | $16,838 |
20 | Denise Chaix-wiig | Saint Helena, CA 94574 | $16,500 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>