Farm Subsidy information
Fresno County, California
Total Subsidies in Fresno County, California, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 341 to 360 of 7,263
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Fresno County, California totaled $1,950,000,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
341 | V F Farms | Alamo, CA 94507 | $842,660 |
342 | Batth Ranch Inc | Fresno, CA 93725 | $840,960 |
343 | La Paloma Farms | Pinedale, CA 93650 | $840,826 |
344 | Meyers Farming Iv | Firebaugh, CA 93622 | $838,864 |
345 | Clyde Emmett | Fresno, CA 93706 | $837,704 |
346 | Paul Singh | Caruthers, CA 93609 | $836,555 |
347 | J Clausen Farms Inc | Cantua Creek, CA 93608 | $836,393 |
348 | Mt Whitney Farms LLC | Fresno, CA 93711 | $835,028 |
349 | F And T Farms 1 | Fresno, CA 93710 | $829,117 |
350 | Cardella Ranch 91 | Mendota, CA 93640 | $828,219 |
351 | John Dresick Dba John Dresick Farms | Huron, CA 93234 | $827,348 |
352 | John & Vicky Seasholtz | Fresno, CA 93705 | $826,443 |
353 | West Prairie Farms | Five Points, CA 93624 | $826,387 |
354 | Forrest D Miller | Clovis, CA 93619 | $826,366 |
355 | Dresick Farms Inc | Huron, CA 93234 | $825,143 |
356 | Generations Dairy | Kerman, CA 93630 | $823,330 |
357 | Rabb Agricultural Associates | San Joaquin, CA 93660 | $823,143 |
358 | Sran Almonds LLC | Kerman, CA 93630 | $814,533 |
359 | Shasta Farms | Pinedale, CA 93650 | $813,085 |
360 | Joaquin Ridge Farm G P | Fresno, CA 93794 | $812,428 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”