Cotton Ginning Program in Glenn County, California, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 30
Recipients of Cotton Ginning Program from farms in Glenn County, California totaled $351,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Cotton Ginning Program 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Larry Hansen Farms | Princeton, CA 95970 | $55,715 |
2 | Newland Family Farms | Willows, CA 95988 | $52,464 |
3 | John Robert Schouten | Butte City, CA 95920 | $35,160 |
4 | Danley Farms | Willows, CA 95988 | $30,642 |
5 | Rick Lederer | Willows, CA 95988 | $28,873 |
6 | Ronald Eck | Butte City, CA 95920 | $19,400 |
7 | David Loewen | Butte City, CA 95920 | $14,050 |
8 | Travis Amoth | Princeton, CA 95970 | $13,466 |
9 | Matthew L Koehn | Willows, CA 95988 | $11,445 |
10 | Erin Koehn | Willows, CA 95988 | $11,445 |
11 | Bradley Unruh | Willows, CA 95988 | $10,673 |
12 | Caleb J Unruh | Willows, CA 95988 | $10,322 |
13 | Howard Loewen | Glenn, CA 95943 | $9,182 |
14 | Robert L Koehn | Willows, CA 95988 | $7,329 |
15 | Derek Giesbrecht | Glenn, CA 95943 | $5,162 |
16 | Howard Giesbrecht Family Trust | Willows, CA 95988 | $4,648 |
17 | Doyle Spence | Willows, CA 95988 | $4,396 |
18 | Brent Loewen | Butte City, CA 95920 | $3,674 |
19 | Christopher Giesbrecht | Princeton, CA 95970 | $3,629 |
20 | Clark Loewen | Butte City, CA 95920 | $2,754 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>