Cotton Ginning Program in Kern County, California, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 91
Recipients of Cotton Ginning Program from farms in Kern County, California totaled $2,054,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Cotton Ginning Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | L Riccomini And Sons | Bakersfield, CA 93312 | $88,762 |
2 | Buttonwillow Land And Cattle Co | Buttonwillow, CA 93206 | $87,416 |
3 | Julian Pierucci & Son | Buttonwillow, CA 93206 | $85,216 |
4 | Progressive Associates Group | Bakersfield, CA 93307 | $81,046 |
5 | Parsons Farms | Buttonwillow, CA 93206 | $80,293 |
6 | Jeff Banducci Farms Inc | Bakersfield, CA 93314 | $80,000 |
7 | Bookland Farms | Buttonwillow, CA 93206 | $74,934 |
8 | Banducci & Son | Buttonwillow, CA 93206 | $65,861 |
9 | Toretta Farms | Buttonwillow, CA 93206 | $64,558 |
10 | Fred Palla Farms | Buttonwillow, CA 93206 | $53,684 |
11 | David Daniel Farms | Bakersfield, CA 93314 | $50,506 |
12 | Sammy Ghilarducci | Bakersfield, CA 93314 | $48,790 |
13 | Triple B Farms | Bakersfield, CA 93311 | $48,401 |
14 | Crettol Farms | Wasco, CA 93280 | $46,208 |
15 | Giannelli Farms LLC | Bakersfield, CA 93313 | $44,090 |
16 | Torigiani Farms | Buttonwillow, CA 93206 | $43,923 |
17 | James Tazioli Exemption Trust | Buttonwillow, CA 93206 | $43,029 |
18 | Lester Neufeld & Son | Wasco, CA 93280 | $42,516 |
19 | Roy & J Romanini Farms | Buttonwillow, CA 93206 | $41,228 |
20 | Alfred Palla Farms | Bakersfield, CA 93309 | $36,676 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>