Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 in Kings County, California, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 419
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 from farms in Kings County, California totaled $45,201,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Droogh Dairy Lp | Lemoore, CA 93245 | $750,000 |
2 | Mattos Bros L P | Hanford, CA 93230 | $750,000 |
3 | Four Star Dairy Lp | Tulare, CA 93274 | $750,000 |
4 | Dairy Avenue LLC | Corcoran, CA 93212 | $750,000 |
5 | Rocking Horse Dairy | Hanford, CA 93230 | $750,000 |
6 | Circle H Dairy LLC | Corcoran, CA 93212 | $750,000 |
7 | Jaques & Son Dairy | Hanford, CA 93230 | $667,295 |
8 | Lakeside Dairy | Tulare, CA 93274 | $650,000 |
9 | Valadao Dairy | Hanford, CA 93230 | $600,137 |
10 | The Dairy, Inc | Five Points, CA 93624 | $593,165 |
11 | Harold Dragt & Sons Dairies LLC | Hanford, CA 93230 | $562,500 |
12 | Sozinho Dairy Inc | Hanford, CA 93230 | $542,367 |
13 | Barreto And Silveira | Hanford, CA 93230 | $523,654 |
14 | Mattos Family Limited Partnership | Hanford, CA 93230 | $517,999 |
15 | Tos Farms Inc | Hanford, CA 93230 | $500,000 |
16 | Hollandia Farms Inc | Hanford, CA 93230 | $500,000 |
17 | Hollands Dairy | Hanford, CA 93230 | $500,000 |
18 | Frank S Brown LLC | Riverdale, CA 93656 | $500,000 |
19 | Lu-ar Dairy | Hanford, CA 93230 | $500,000 |
20 | Cloverdale Dairy LLC | Hanford, CA 93230 | $500,000 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>