Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 in Los Angeles County, California, 1995-2021

Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 39

Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 from farms in Los Angeles County, California totaled $2,791,000 in from 1995-2021.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2
1995-2021
1Dick David Diana & Douglas ZylstraLa Verne, CA 91750$750,000
2T-y Nursery IncTorrance, CA 90503$500,000
3High Desert Dairy LLCLancaster, CA 93535$351,510
4Ironwood Unlimited, Inc. Dba El Nativo GrowerLa Crescenta, CA 91214$140,931
5Aroma Orchids Of Rowland HeightsRowland Heights, CA 91748$140,466
6Mike's Produce IncDowney, CA 90241$131,192
7New West Growers, Inc.Compton, CA 90221$103,785
8Pinedas Nursery, Inc.Santa Ana, CA 92704$79,415
9Bill's Bees, IncLakewood, CA 90712$65,089
10Honey Pacifica CompanyDowney, CA 90242$58,391
11Tenerelli OrchardsActon, CA 93510$54,191
12Anelo Landscape Solution IncSylmar, CA 91342$53,030
13Ricardo R Arrivillaga Dba RicardoLong Beach, CA 90805$50,465
14Mi Jalisco Nursery Inc.Lakewood, CA 90713$39,350
15S-y Nursery IncCerritos, CA 90703$31,572
16Humedo Nursery LLCDowney, CA 90242$30,346
17Filemon G LopezBellflower, CA 90706$29,106
18Urban HomesteadPasadena, CA 91103$24,671
19Enterprising Bee Co., LLCChatsworth, CA 91311$22,332
20Edward Robert FeinsteinLeona Valley, CA 93551$19,117

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag