Market Facilitation Program (MFP) in Madera County, California, 2021

Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 20

Recipients of Market Facilitation Program (MFP) from farms in Madera County, California totaled $405,000 in in 2021.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Market Facilitation Program (MFP)
2021
1G & G Andrew Farms L PMadera, CA 93637$91,944
2Agriland Holdings IncChowchilla, CA 93610$51,122
3Jennifer Harris BlissMadera, CA 93637$50,855
4Enia Farms LLCMadera, CA 93637$42,385
5Pressley 99 LpSan Diego, CA 92126$34,310
6T & D Farms LpFresno, CA 93711$25,568
7Alkali Hollow Farms IncMadera, CA 93637$25,518
8Msm Airport LLCMadera, CA 93637$16,586
9Creekside Land Co LLCMadera, CA 93637$15,238
10American United Farms LLCStockton, CA 95212$11,137
11William Koch Boyd J Magdall Et Al Ptr Madera PistaLas Vegas, NV 89121$6,942
12William R Koch S F Clark D Stewart T D Stewart G LLas Vegas, NV 89121$5,754
13M Edward Maule Gerald P Hogan & Mclloyd Barney EtaLas Vegas, NV 89121$5,647
14Daniel L & Sharon L Rich Judith S Somervell Etal PLas Vegas, NV 89121$5,617
15Elizabeth & John A Bowers A J Magar & C & D LutesLas Vegas, NV 89121$5,352
16Richard P WalkerChowchilla, CA 93610$3,992
17Fredrick G Gould Edward S Gould & Henry A Fanger PChowchilla, CA 93610$3,028
18Gerald L Higgins Susan L Ogilvie Ley Yelinger & GrLas Vegas, NV 89121$2,660
19Fam Tr Cr Under The Smith Living Tr Udt May 2 2001Chowchilla, CA 93610$1,339
20Madera Fig & Pistachio Farms Lawrence R Knowles GeMadera, CA 93637$461

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag