Total Disaster Programs in Marin County, California, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 99
Recipients of Total Disaster Programs from farms in Marin County, California totaled $3,730,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Disaster Programs 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Moretti Family Dairy | Petaluma, CA 94952 | $58,073 |
22 | Loren Poncia | Tomales, CA 94971 | $51,038 |
23 | Barbara Hall | Rohnert Park, CA 94928 | $50,373 |
24 | Manuel A Brazil | Petaluma, CA 94975 | $49,454 |
25 | Doniga Markegard | Half Moon Bay, CA 94019 | $48,949 |
26 | Larry Peter | Petaluma, CA 94952 | $48,070 |
27 | Double M Dairy LLC | Point Reyes Station, CA 94956 | $46,973 |
28 | William Nunes | Point Reyes Station, CA 94956 | $46,109 |
29 | Grossi Family M-ranch LLC | Inverness, CA 94937 | $45,964 |
30 | Spaletta Beef Ranch | Valley Ford, CA 94972 | $45,694 |
31 | Rancho Tocaloma-donald J Mcisaac & Ted Mcisaac Ptr | Point Reyes Station, CA 94956 | $45,638 |
32 | Doug Ielmorini Dairy | Nicasio, CA 94946 | $43,834 |
33 | Eugene C Poncia | Tomales, CA 94971 | $43,227 |
34 | Francis Chris Cornett | Petaluma, CA 94952 | $40,269 |
35 | Spaletta Dairy | Point Reyes Station, CA 94956 | $40,241 |
36 | Thornton Dairy | Tomales, CA 94971 | $40,174 |
37 | Bordessa Family Dairies Gp | Valley Ford, CA 94972 | $39,104 |
38 | John Goldbeck | Petaluma, CA 94952 | $37,045 |
39 | Moreda Valley Dairy | Petaluma, CA 94952 | $33,940 |
40 | James Mcisaac | Novato, CA 94947 | $33,651 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”