Miscellaneous Conservation Programs in Marin County, California, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 30
Recipients of Miscellaneous Conservation Programs from farms in Marin County, California totaled $111,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Miscellaneous Conservation Programs 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Richard Grossi | Inverness, CA 94937 | $11,586 |
2 | Rancho Tocaloma | Point Reyes Station, CA 94956 | $10,996 |
3 | Dan Evans | Inverness, CA 94937 | $7,000 |
4 | Dolcini Livestock | Petaluma, CA 94952 | $7,000 |
5 | Diamond Z Dairy | Marshall, CA 94940 | $5,292 |
6 | R L Sartori Dairy | Tomales, CA 94971 | $4,315 |
7 | David C Morton | Petaluma, CA 94952 | $3,500 |
8 | Leroy Erickson | Petaluma, CA 94954 | $3,500 |
9 | Elizabeth B. Hanlein | Novato, CA 94947 | $3,500 |
10 | Michael Percy | Nicasio, CA 94946 | $3,500 |
11 | John P Gobbi | Petaluma, CA 94952 | $3,500 |
12 | Elizabeth W. Dolcini | Petaluma, CA 94952 | $3,500 |
13 | Martin Pozzi | Valley Ford, CA 94972 | $3,500 |
14 | Valley Ford Sheep Ranch | Valley Ford, CA 94972 | $3,500 |
15 | Brown Bag Farms | Petaluma, CA 94952 | $3,500 |
16 | G B T Nunes & Co | Point Reyes Station, CA 94956 | $3,425 |
17 | George Nunes & Co. | Point Reyes Station, CA 94956 | $3,300 |
18 | Wayne Bloom | Petaluma, CA 94952 | $3,002 |
19 | Mcisaac Dairy | Novato, CA 94947 | $3,000 |
20 | Rosemary Casarotti | Petaluma, CA 94952 | $2,900 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>