Total Commodity Programs in Mendocino County, California, 2020
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 264
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Mendocino County, California totaled $8,301,000 in in 2020.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2020 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Alvin Tollini | Ukiah, CA 95482 | $58,736 |
42 | Tim Todd | Redwood Valley, CA 95470 | $58,424 |
43 | Taylor P Serres | Sonoma, CA 95476 | $57,331 |
44 | Tia M Satterwhite | Redwood Valley, CA 95470 | $56,612 |
45 | Bacchus Vineyards, LLC | Ukiah, CA 95482 | $56,235 |
46 | Mcmenomey Vineyards | Potter Valley, CA 95469 | $55,970 |
47 | Magruder Ranch LLC | Potter Valley, CA 95469 | $55,591 |
48 | Todd Brothers | Redwood Valley, CA 95470 | $51,917 |
49 | Betty A Foster | Redwood Valley, CA 95470 | $50,399 |
50 | Humberto Nunez | Talmage, CA 95481 | $48,817 |
51 | Bay Tree Vineyards LLC | Ukiah, CA 95482 | $48,224 |
52 | Vincent Doyle | Comptche, CA 95427 | $46,342 |
53 | Ken Todd | Redwood Valley, CA 95470 | $45,883 |
54 | Bartolomei Brothers Vineyard | Talmage, CA 95481 | $45,316 |
55 | Patianna Organic Vineyards, LLC | Hopland, CA 95449 | $44,289 |
56 | James Ponts | Fort Bragg, CA 95437 | $43,401 |
57 | Vincent Barney | Covelo, CA 95428 | $43,333 |
58 | Great Fermentations, Inc | Colorado Springs, CO 80906 | $43,180 |
59 | Todd Organic Orchards Inc | Potter Valley, CA 95469 | $42,164 |
60 | Stornetta Bros | Point Arena, CA 95468 | $41,209 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”