Counter Cyclical Program in Merced County, California, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 999
Recipients of Counter Cyclical Program from farms in Merced County, California totaled $63,346,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Counter Cyclical Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | S J R Farming | Los Banos, CA 93635 | $3,641,169 |
2 | A-bar Ag Enterprises | Firebaugh, CA 93622 | $1,599,194 |
3 | Teixeira And Sons | Los Banos, CA 93635 | $1,185,230 |
4 | Gilardi Farms | Los Banos, CA 93635 | $1,076,907 |
5 | David Santos Farming | Los Banos, CA 93635 | $934,558 |
6 | Menefee & Sons II | Los Banos, CA 93635 | $818,323 |
7 | John & Vicky Seasholtz | Fresno, CA 93705 | $813,604 |
8 | David Carlucci Farms | Los Banos, CA 93635 | $776,016 |
9 | Double Diamond Dairy & Ranch | El Nido, CA 95317 | $754,012 |
10 | Christiana Santa Rita | Dos Palos, CA 93620 | $745,268 |
11 | Andrews Farms | Dos Palos, CA 93620 | $733,885 |
12 | Pentagon Company | Los Banos, CA 93635 | $705,522 |
13 | Pafford Farms | Dos Palos, CA 93620 | $685,504 |
14 | Gamboni Farming Co | Dos Palos, CA 93620 | $670,928 |
15 | Arroya Farms | Los Banos, CA 93635 | $666,804 |
16 | Edward And Nancy Silva | El Nido, CA 95317 | $640,250 |
17 | William Sloan Farms | Los Banos, CA 93635 | $620,033 |
18 | Del-mar Farms | Patterson, CA 95363 | $527,286 |
19 | 4-w Ranch | Dos Palos, CA 93620 | $513,167 |
20 | Bob & Jim Bertao | Dos Palos, CA 93620 | $511,020 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>