Market Facilitation Program (MFP) in Merced County, California, 2019
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 756
Recipients of Market Facilitation Program (MFP) from farms in Merced County, California totaled $26,389,000 in in 2019.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Facilitation Program (MFP) 2019 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Gerrilynn De Jager | Chowchilla, CA 93610 | $207,765 |
22 | A & R Dejager Farms Jv | Chowchilla, CA 93610 | $207,080 |
23 | John B Pires And Eldred C Pires Ptr | Gustine, CA 95322 | $201,748 |
24 | Gamboni Farming Co | Dos Palos, CA 93620 | $196,886 |
25 | Forebay Farms LLC | Merced, CA 95344 | $191,176 |
26 | Lewis Maiorino Ranches Inc | Dos Palos, CA 93620 | $190,555 |
27 | Borba Dairy Farms Lp | Hilmar, CA 95324 | $189,423 |
28 | Rockshar Dairy | Merced, CA 95341 | $187,119 |
29 | Gilardi Farms | Los Banos, CA 93635 | $186,798 |
30 | Pentagon Company | Los Banos, CA 93635 | $181,287 |
31 | 3 Machado Dairy Inc | Merced, CA 95341 | $178,022 |
32 | J P M Ag | Los Banos, CA 93635 | $177,208 |
33 | Mayo Dairy Lp | Le Grand, CA 95333 | $175,967 |
34 | De Jager Dairy North | Chowchilla, CA 93610 | $175,332 |
35 | John & Vicky Seasholtz | Fresno, CA 93705 | $164,637 |
36 | Rodney De Jager | Merced, CA 95341 | $162,696 |
37 | Sharlene De Jager | Merced, CA 95341 | $162,696 |
38 | Homen Dairy Farms Lp | Merced, CA 95341 | $162,539 |
39 | Wl Goodman & Sons | Dos Palos, CA 93620 | $158,668 |
40 | Rodoni Dairy Farms Lp | Los Banos, CA 93635 | $153,522 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”