Market Facilitation Program (MFP) in Merced County, California, 2020
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 940
Recipients of Market Facilitation Program (MFP) from farms in Merced County, California totaled $19,033,000 in in 2020.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Facilitation Program (MFP) 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | James J Stevinson Corp | Newman, CA 95360 | $500,000 |
| 2 | Hundal Farms Inc | Merced, CA 95348 | $375,000 |
| 3 | Tony L Lopes Dairy Lp | Gustine, CA 95322 | $351,836 |
| 4 | Farm Management Inc | Ballico, CA 95303 | $324,441 |
| 5 | David Santos Farming | Los Banos, CA 93635 | $313,216 |
| 6 | De Jager Dairy North | Chowchilla, CA 93610 | $301,930 |
| 7 | Bradford Nyman | Hilmar, CA 95324 | $247,451 |
| 8 | Five H Farms | Merced, CA 95341 | $237,712 |
| 9 | Edward And Nancy Silva | El Nido, CA 95317 | $223,267 |
| 10 | Pattabiraman Balam Iyer | Gustine, CA 95322 | $218,436 |
| 11 | Wl Goodman & Sons | Dos Palos, CA 93620 | $214,133 |
| 12 | Fred Melo | Atwater, CA 95301 | $213,352 |
| 13 | Soares Dairy Farms Inc | Los Banos, CA 93635 | $210,670 |
| 14 | Mike & Wendy Vander Dussen | El Nido, CA 95317 | $195,628 |
| 15 | Rhm Farms | Merced, CA 95340 | $182,099 |
| 16 | Borba Dairy Farms Lp | Hilmar, CA 95324 | $174,199 |
| 17 | Live Oak Farms Lp | Le Grand, CA 95333 | $173,970 |
| 18 | Meena Farms | Gustine, CA 95322 | $172,531 |
| 19 | Satyam Farms | Gustine, CA 95322 | $170,267 |
| 20 | Vierra Dairy Farm | Hilmar, CA 95324 | $164,555 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf