Market Facilitation Program (MFP) in Merced County, California, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 1,095
Recipients of Market Facilitation Program (MFP) from farms in Merced County, California totaled $51,399,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Facilitation Program (MFP) 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Dores Dairy Ptn | Stevinson, CA 95374 | $261,539 |
42 | Fred Melo | Atwater, CA 95301 | $259,486 |
43 | David Carlucci Farms | Los Banos, CA 93635 | $259,411 |
44 | Martins Bros Dairy Farms Gp | Hilmar, CA 95324 | $256,735 |
45 | De Jager Farms South | Chowchilla, CA 93610 | $256,002 |
46 | Soares Dairy Farms Inc | Los Banos, CA 93635 | $250,317 |
47 | Forebay Farms LLC | Merced, CA 95344 | $249,134 |
48 | Bradford Nyman | Hilmar, CA 95324 | $247,451 |
49 | Rodney Nylund | Hilmar, CA 95324 | $243,074 |
50 | Frank Coelho & Sons Lp | El Nido, CA 95317 | $240,917 |
51 | Five H Farms | Merced, CA 95341 | $237,712 |
52 | S J R Farming | Los Banos, CA 93635 | $226,936 |
53 | Gilardi Farms | Los Banos, CA 93635 | $226,337 |
54 | Sierra Vista Dairy Lp | Denair, CA 95316 | $225,560 |
55 | Edward And Nancy Silva | El Nido, CA 95317 | $223,267 |
56 | Rockshar Dairy | Merced, CA 95341 | $221,771 |
57 | Gamboni Farming Co | Dos Palos, CA 93620 | $221,700 |
58 | Vaz Dairy | Los Banos, CA 93635 | $221,699 |
59 | A J Borba Holsteins | Hilmar, CA 95324 | $220,636 |
60 | Bettencourt & Marson Dairy | Hilmar, CA 95324 | $219,049 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”