Total Commodity Programs in Merced County, California, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 3,512
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Merced County, California totaled $631,820,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | A-bar Ag Enterprises | Firebaugh, CA 93622 | $8,518,559 |
2 | S J R Farming | Los Banos, CA 93635 | $7,720,080 |
3 | Teixeira And Sons | Los Banos, CA 93635 | $6,390,133 |
4 | Roduner Farms | Merced, CA 95341 | $5,477,952 |
5 | David Santos Farming | Los Banos, CA 93635 | $4,546,991 |
6 | Gilardi Farms | Los Banos, CA 93635 | $4,217,682 |
7 | De Jager Dairy North | Chowchilla, CA 93610 | $3,530,546 |
8 | Favier Farms | Atwater, CA 95301 | $3,383,816 |
9 | David Carlucci Farms | Los Banos, CA 93635 | $3,369,579 |
10 | Double Diamond Dairy & Ranch | El Nido, CA 95317 | $3,366,150 |
11 | Pedretti Ranches Inc | El Nido, CA 95317 | $3,357,429 |
12 | Gallo Farming Company | Atwater, CA 95301 | $3,317,532 |
13 | Edward And Nancy Silva | El Nido, CA 95317 | $3,315,546 |
14 | Soares Dairy Farms Inc | Los Banos, CA 93635 | $3,284,783 |
15 | Dores Dairy Ptn | Stevinson, CA 95374 | $3,172,177 |
16 | Pentagon Company | Los Banos, CA 93635 | $3,033,783 |
17 | Joe Soares Dairy | Delhi, CA 95315 | $2,967,499 |
18 | Hoogendam Dairy | Merced, CA 95341 | $2,911,816 |
19 | Gamboni Farming Co | Dos Palos, CA 93620 | $2,831,852 |
20 | David And Peggy Farmer Jv | El Nido, CA 95317 | $2,831,144 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>