Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 in Modoc County, California, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 166
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 from farms in Modoc County, California totaled $7,921,000 in from 1995-2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 1995-2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Tally Ho Farms Partnership Dba Walker Brothers | Merrill, OR 97633 | $763,813 |
| 2 | Seus Family Farms Inc | Tulelake, CA 96134 | $497,437 |
| 3 | Lyman Farms LLC | Tulelake, CA 96134 | $303,972 |
| 4 | Rodney R Flournoy | Likely, CA 96116 | $250,000 |
| 5 | Robert A Byrne Co | Malin, OR 97632 | $244,130 |
| 6 | Carey Ranch LLC | Fort Bidwell, CA 96112 | $214,141 |
| 7 | Wright Family Farms LLC | Malin, OR 97632 | $211,267 |
| 8 | 3-l Organics, LLC | Tulelake, CA 96134 | $196,028 |
| 9 | Raymond Anklin | Alturas, CA 96101 | $186,427 |
| 10 | Likely Land & Livestock | Likely, CA 96116 | $183,529 |
| 11 | Richard Anklin | Canby, CA 96015 | $179,056 |
| 12 | Rafael Hernandez | Tulelake, CA 96134 | $175,200 |
| 13 | Gerald G Kresge | Alturas, CA 96101 | $160,219 |
| 14 | Robert L Cockrell Ranch LLC | Cedarville, CA 96104 | $149,491 |
| 15 | Panhandle West, Inc | Malin, OR 97632 | $143,315 |
| 16 | Will J Cockrell Dba Cockrell Lc Cattle Ranch | Cedarville, CA 96104 | $142,484 |
| 17 | Erquiaga Ranch | Cedarville, CA 96104 | $140,775 |
| 18 | Robert Stayer | Red Bluff, CA 96080 | $128,339 |
| 19 | Rene Larranaga | Alturas, CA 96101 | $119,347 |
| 20 | James T Cockrell | Lake City, CA 96115 | $107,581 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf