Farm Subsidy information
Monterey County, California
Total Subsidies in Monterey County, California, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 1,309
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Monterey County, California totaled $198,686,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Huntington Farms Inc | Soledad, CA 93960 | $928,104 |
22 | Miller Bros Gp | San Miguel, CA 93451 | $906,265 |
23 | Rio Farms LLC | Oxnard, CA 93030 | $901,729 |
24 | Rincon Farms Inc | Gonzales, CA 93926 | $901,683 |
25 | Kevin D Kester | San Miguel, CA 93451 | $882,638 |
26 | Fairview Road Ranch Jv | Santa Paula, CA 93060 | $874,098 |
27 | Pierre Camsuzou | San Miguel, CA 93451 | $851,516 |
28 | Rava Ranches Inc | King City, CA 93930 | $847,321 |
29 | Zada Fresh Farms LLC | Salinas, CA 93901 | $824,219 |
30 | Larry Homen | King City, CA 93930 | $822,709 |
31 | Work Ranch LLC | San Miguel, CA 93451 | $795,706 |
32 | Altman Specialty Plants LLC | Salinas, CA 93908 | $795,000 |
33 | Jon Cooper | San Lucas, CA 93954 | $769,426 |
34 | Arioto Bosio Partnership | Reno, NV 89511 | $756,245 |
35 | True Leaf Holdings Inc. | Salinas, CA 93902 | $750,000 |
36 | Luis A. Scattini & Sons Lp | Salinas, CA 93901 | $672,133 |
37 | Louis Calcagno | Moss Landing, CA 95039 | $652,968 |
38 | George R Work | San Miguel, CA 93451 | $648,103 |
39 | , | $639,087 | |
40 | C S & O Farms Gp | Watsonville, CA 95076 | $604,081 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”