Total Commodity Programs in Monterey County, California, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 193
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Monterey County, California totaled $7,155,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Fairview Road Ranch Jv | Santa Paula, CA 93060 | $576,090 |
2 | Ortega Berry Farms LLC | Royal Oaks, CA 95076 | $500,000 |
3 | R & R Berry Farms Inc | Castroville, CA 93907 | $490,582 |
4 | Nino Ranch LLC | King City, CA 93930 | $351,618 |
5 | La Selva Farms LLC | Watsonville, CA 95077 | $350,000 |
6 | Arioto Bosio Partnership | Reno, NV 89511 | $261,603 |
7 | Merrill Farms LLC | Salinas, CA 93902 | $255,000 |
8 | Hydra-point Plant Growers Inc | Salinas, CA 93912 | $250,000 |
9 | Metzer Farms Inc | Gonzales, CA 93926 | $250,000 |
10 | Enrique Melgoza | Watsonville, CA 95077 | $250,000 |
11 | Los Altos Farms LLC | Aromas, CA 95004 | $246,750 |
12 | South County Packing Inc | King City, CA 93930 | $210,045 |
13 | Mission Ranch Vineyard LLC | Soledad, CA 93960 | $201,586 |
14 | Fidel M Tapia Sr Aka Fidel T Melgoza | Salinas, CA 93905 | $170,345 |
15 | Pura & Parrish LLC | Salinas, CA 93901 | $133,633 |
16 | Concepcion Ramirez De Raya | Salinas, CA 93907 | $105,759 |
17 | John Nino | King City, CA 93930 | $96,415 |
18 | Seawave Corporation | Salinas, CA 93901 | $88,394 |
19 | Jorge V Gonzalez | Aromas, CA 95004 | $79,243 |
20 | Gary Franscioni Inc | Soledad, CA 93960 | $78,043 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>