Farm Subsidy information
Monterey County, California
Total Subsidies in Monterey County, California, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 227
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Monterey County, California totaled $13,247,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Vista De Los Padres Vineyard | Spreckels, CA 93962 | $31,293 |
62 | Nunes Vegetables Inc | Salinas, CA 93902 | $30,502 |
63 | David Robles Torres | Watsonville, CA 95076 | $30,400 |
64 | Daniel A Mainini | San Miguel, CA 93451 | $30,007 |
65 | Monterey Abalone Co Inc | Monterey, CA 93940 | $29,392 |
66 | Kimberly Botts | Lockwood, CA 93932 | $29,278 |
67 | Joseph Steven Gamecho | Pacific Grove, CA 93950 | $29,024 |
68 | Timothy Eric Taylor Jr | Lockwood, CA 93932 | $28,507 |
69 | Tira Nanza Ranch LLC | Pebble Beach, CA 93953 | $28,003 |
70 | Jamie Ann Collins | Aromas, CA 95004 | $27,155 |
71 | Ronald W Bernard | San Ardo, CA 93450 | $26,443 |
72 | Rj Livestock LLC | Paso Robles, CA 93446 | $26,404 |
73 | Be Berry Farms LLC | Salinas, CA 93907 | $25,731 |
74 | Mike M Mallory | King City, CA 93930 | $25,496 |
75 | Daniel Jaureguy | San Miguel, CA 93451 | $24,975 |
76 | Kathryn Freeman Rossi | San Ardo, CA 93450 | $24,552 |
77 | John H Soares | Lockwood, CA 93932 | $24,535 |
78 | Douglas H Thomason | San Miguel, CA 93451 | $24,448 |
79 | Smith Livestock LLC | Shandon, CA 93461 | $24,366 |
80 | Rodnick LLC | Soledad, CA 93960 | $23,626 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”