Farm Subsidy information
Monterey County, California
Total Subsidies in Monterey County, California, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 157
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Monterey County, California totaled $15,267,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | , | $18,962 | |
82 | Timothy Hearne | King City, CA 93930 | $18,688 |
83 | Cova Investments LLC | Salinas, CA 93901 | $18,213 |
84 | Glenna Gean Mainini | San Miguel, CA 93451 | $18,036 |
85 | John Nino | King City, CA 93930 | $16,861 |
86 | Eric Schmidt | King City, CA 93930 | $16,515 |
87 | Henry Carrasco Dba Chula Vina Vin | Salinas, CA 93901 | $16,488 |
88 | , | $15,805 | |
89 | Kathryn Freeman Rossi | San Ardo, CA 93450 | $15,413 |
90 | Raymond O Dauth 2014 Revocable Trust | Paso Robles, CA 93446 | $14,608 |
91 | G R Rhyne And Linda L Rhyne 1997 Revocable Trust | Paso Robles, CA 93447 | $14,608 |
92 | Richard Casey | King City, CA 93930 | $14,552 |
93 | Rebecca Lee Mora | San Miguel, CA 93451 | $14,348 |
94 | Cody Lee Mora | San Miguel, CA 93451 | $14,264 |
95 | Pedrazzi Farms LLC | Salinas, CA 93908 | $12,701 |
96 | William L Whitney | King City, CA 93930 | $12,417 |
97 | Justin Dunaway Farr | Salinas, CA 93901 | $12,397 |
98 | Michael J O'connor | Paso Robles, CA 93447 | $12,274 |
99 | Patrick C Palmer | Coalinga, CA 93210 | $11,801 |
100 | Dennis Folks | Coalinga, CA 93210 | $11,276 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”