Farm Subsidy information
Monterey County, California
Total Subsidies in Monterey County, California, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 213
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Monterey County, California totaled $13,867,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Sharon Renee Little | San Ardo, CA 93450 | $14,427 |
82 | Maria Narez Farms Dba | Salinas, CA 93906 | $14,335 |
83 | , | $14,103 | |
84 | , | $13,922 | |
85 | , | $13,804 | |
86 | Garlinger Cattle Company Inc | Salinas, CA 93908 | $13,799 |
87 | Thomas Berrelleza | Aromas, CA 95004 | $13,623 |
88 | , | $13,581 | |
89 | Tyler J Mora | Covelo, CA 95428 | $13,409 |
90 | Rebecca Lee Mora | San Miguel, CA 93451 | $13,128 |
91 | Linda Y Ferrasci | Carmel Valley, CA 93924 | $12,602 |
92 | Adalberto Vasquez Dba C & A Berri | Salinas, CA 93907 | $12,031 |
93 | Ben & Kelly Work Family Trust 2008 | San Miguel, CA 93451 | $11,876 |
94 | Gema Berry Farms Inc | Westlake Village, CA 91361 | $11,875 |
95 | Green Valley Floral Inc | Salinas, CA 93908 | $11,875 |
96 | Leonor Ramirez- Barajas | Salinas, CA 93907 | $11,825 |
97 | Cody Lee Mora | San Miguel, CA 93451 | $11,767 |
98 | Charles Schlough | Salinas, CA 93901 | $11,717 |
99 | Seven Livestock Company LLC | San Ardo, CA 93450 | $11,649 |
100 | Lucia Narez Dba Perez And Narez F | Salinas, CA 93906 | $11,549 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”