Farm Subsidy information
Monterey County, California
Total Subsidies in Monterey County, California, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 121 to 140 of 227
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Monterey County, California totaled $13,247,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
121 | Eric Schmidt | King City, CA 93930 | $7,633 |
122 | Roger A Miller Dba Miller Brothers | San Miguel, CA 93451 | $7,545 |
123 | The Russell Family Trust | Northridge, CA 91324 | $7,386 |
124 | Jose Juan Pulido Garcia | Watsonville, CA 95077 | $7,280 |
125 | Thomas Bert Davi | Salinas, CA 93908 | $7,126 |
126 | Justin Dunaway Farr | Salinas, CA 93901 | $6,982 |
127 | Martin Avina Hernandez | Salinas, CA 93915 | $6,806 |
128 | Daniel Deroza | Salinas, CA 93908 | $6,591 |
129 | Efrain Alanis Dba Alanis Berry Farms | Watsonville, CA 95077 | $6,576 |
130 | M & M Dairy Inc | Gonzales, CA 93926 | $6,518 |
131 | Dusty Jo Johnson | San Ardo, CA 93450 | $6,374 |
132 | Nate Holaday | King City, CA 93930 | $6,218 |
133 | John P Madson | San Lucas, CA 93954 | $5,974 |
134 | Lorraine Colburn | Gonzales, CA 93926 | $5,707 |
135 | Oak Creek Apple Ranch Gp | San Miguel, CA 93451 | $5,561 |
136 | Reliz Cattle Company LLC | Gonzales, CA 93926 | $5,441 |
137 | Alvin B Bray | King City, CA 93930 | $5,412 |
138 | Patterson Ranchtic | Lockwood, CA 93932 | $5,330 |
139 | Patrick C Palmer | Coalinga, CA 93210 | $5,073 |
140 | Rebecca Lee Mora | San Miguel, CA 93451 | $5,002 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”