Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC) in Monterey County, California, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 41
Recipients of Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC) from farms in Monterey County, California totaled $500,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC) 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Robin L Rist | King City, CA 93930 | $7,164 |
22 | Gregory N Brown | Bradley, CA 93426 | $6,863 |
23 | William C Rist | King City, CA 93930 | $6,579 |
24 | Nessen Schmidt | King City, CA 93930 | $6,566 |
25 | John O Varian | Parkfield, CA 93451 | $6,465 |
26 | Russell Gillett | Lockwood, CA 93932 | $4,846 |
27 | Roger A Miller Dba Miller Brothers | San Miguel, CA 93451 | $3,645 |
28 | Douglas Merlin Thomason | Woodlake, CA 93286 | $3,602 |
29 | Long Valley Land Gp | King City, CA 93930 | $3,350 |
30 | Paso Robles Farming LLC | Paso Robles, CA 93446 | $2,215 |
31 | Heinsen Survivor Trust | Lockwood, CA 93932 | $2,041 |
32 | John W Sonne | Bradley, CA 93426 | $1,331 |
33 | Thomas R Martinus | Lockwood, CA 93932 | $932 |
34 | Jacob J Wiebe | Midvale, ID 83645 | $930 |
35 | Robert Bianchi | Gilroy, CA 95020 | $766 |
36 | Camany Family Trust | Lockwood, CA 93932 | $702 |
37 | Burton James Barrington | King City, CA 93930 | $579 |
38 | Miller Bros Cattle Gp | San Miguel, CA 93451 | $44 |
39 | Neil Wollesen | Lockwood, CA 93932 | $40 |
40 | Wollesen Properties Trust | Lockwood, CA 93932 | $13 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”