Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC) in Monterey County, California, 2020
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 23
Recipients of Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC) from farms in Monterey County, California totaled $56,821 in in 2020.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC) 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | William R Barbree | King City, CA 93930 | $8,141 |
| 2 | Larry Homen | King City, CA 93930 | $4,493 |
| 3 | The Anthony L. Lombardo Separate | Salinas, CA 93902 | $4,394 |
| 4 | Nino Ranch LLC | King City, CA 93930 | $4,362 |
| 5 | John M Hurl | Shandon, CA 93461 | $3,970 |
| 6 | Kenneth Eade | San Ardo, CA 93450 | $3,181 |
| 7 | Miller Brothers Cattle Inc | San Miguel, CA 93451 | $3,157 |
| 8 | Work Ranch LLC | San Miguel, CA 93451 | $2,883 |
| 9 | Robin L Rist | King City, CA 93930 | $2,562 |
| 10 | Douglas H Thomason | San Miguel, CA 93451 | $2,202 |
| 11 | Timothy Hearne | King City, CA 93930 | $2,127 |
| 12 | Demaree Ranch LLC | San Ardo, CA 93450 | $2,115 |
| 13 | Roger A Miller Dba Miller Brothers | San Miguel, CA 93451 | $2,060 |
| 14 | John Moore | San Miguel, CA 93451 | $2,049 |
| 15 | W J Van Boxtel | San Miguel, CA 93451 | $1,893 |
| 16 | Daniel A Mainini | San Miguel, CA 93451 | $1,531 |
| 17 | Gregory N Brown | Bradley, CA 93426 | $1,222 |
| 18 | Jacob J Wiebe | Shandon, CA 93461 | $1,209 |
| 19 | Nessen Schmidt | King City, CA 93930 | $1,104 |
| 20 | Russell Gillett | Lockwood, CA 93932 | $992 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf