Total Conservation Programs in Monterey County, California, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 216
Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in Monterey County, California totaled $8,222,000 in from 1995-2023.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Conservation Programs 1995-2023 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Raymond O Dauth 2014 Revocable Trust | Paso Robles, CA 93446 | $513,394 |
| 2 | Work Family Estate Trust | San Miguel, CA 93451 | $490,993 |
| 3 | Daniel A Mainini | San Miguel, CA 93451 | $404,905 |
| 4 | G R Rhyne And Linda L Rhyne 1997 Revocable Trust | Paso Robles, CA 93447 | $351,661 |
| 5 | George R Work | San Miguel, CA 93451 | $332,994 |
| 6 | Cagliero Family Estate Trust Fami | Paso Robles, CA 93446 | $299,807 |
| 7 | Porter Estate Company Bradley Ran | San Francisco, CA 94104 | $231,205 |
| 8 | Stonesifer Irrevocable Trust | Fair Oaks, CA 95628 | $223,300 |
| 9 | M V Merritt Irrev Trust | Atascadero, CA 93422 | $220,349 |
| 10 | Glenna Gean Mainini | San Miguel, CA 93451 | $214,646 |
| 11 | Vineyard Wildlife Ranch LLC | Paso Robles, CA 93447 | $189,183 |
| 12 | Glen R Rhyne | Paso Robles, CA 93447 | $178,741 |
| 13 | Pierre Camsuzou | San Miguel, CA 93451 | $170,229 |
| 14 | The Russell Family Trust | Northridge, CA 91324 | $155,151 |
| 15 | John O Varian | Parkfield, CA 93451 | $152,476 |
| 16 | Pete J Cagliero Rt | San Miguel, CA 93451 | $148,823 |
| 17 | K L Eade Family Trust | San Ardo, CA 93450 | $147,915 |
| 18 | Robert J Laughlin Jr Separate Property Trust | San Miguel, CA 93451 | $140,481 |
| 19 | Scobie & Sons | Shandon, CA 93461 | $132,839 |
| 20 | Portuguese Canyon Ranching Partne | San Miguel, CA 93451 | $132,340 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Increasing crop reference prices would hurt young farmers
Do billionaires get farm subsidies?
Crop insurance pays billions in weather-related losses linked to the climate crisis
Crop insurance costs soar over time, reaching a record high in 2022
As the climate emergency heats up the Southwest, crop insurance payouts for heat surge
In the intensifying climate crisis, a hotter Southwest spurs rising heat-related crop insurance costs
