Total Conservation Programs in Monterey County, California, 2021

Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 25

Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in Monterey County, California totaled $231,000 in in 2021.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Total Conservation Programs
2021
1Vineyard Wildlife Ranch LLCPaso Robles, CA 93447$48,899
2Work Family Estate TrustSan Miguel, CA 93451$36,064
3Raymond O Dauth 2014 Revocable TrustPaso Robles, CA 93446$31,336
4G R Rhyne And Linda L Rhyne 1997 Revocable TrustPaso Robles, CA 93447$31,336
5Glenna Gean MaininiSan Miguel, CA 93451$18,572
6Daniel A MaininiSan Miguel, CA 93451$18,571
7Robert J Laughlin Jr Separate Property TrustSan Miguel, CA 93451$10,554
8The Russell Family TrustNorthridge, CA 91324$7,386
9Oak Creek Apple Ranch GpSan Miguel, CA 93451$5,561
10Emma Iarussi Revocable TrustAustin, TX 78703$4,523
11Camany Family TrustLockwood, CA 93932$3,872
12M V Merritt Irrev TrustAtascadero, CA 93422$3,151
13William J ClarkKing City, CA 93930$3,132
14Heinsen Q-tip Trust Dated 4/14/1997Lockwood, CA 93932$1,210
15Heinsen Decedent Trust Dated 4/14/1997Lockwood, CA 93932$1,210
16Allen And Marian Stonesifer Family 1985 RevocableLincoln, CA 95648$941
17David Rhea Steele Sr & Gwendolynne Virginia StonesVolcano, CA 95689$941
18The Collins Revocable Trust Dated 11-1-18Ventura, CA 93001$941
19Swinehart Family TrustCarmichael, CA 95608$578
20Glenn Ward Irrev Trust Dated April 29 2010Ventura, CA 93003$574

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag