Total Disaster Programs in Sacramento County, California, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 141 to 160 of 590
Recipients of Total Disaster Programs from farms in Sacramento County, California totaled $22,539,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Disaster Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
141 | Mendes Dairy | Elk Grove, CA 95757 | $43,274 |
142 | , | $43,165 | |
143 | , | $43,046 | |
144 | Ernesto Moules | Herald, CA 95638 | $42,011 |
145 | Bastiao Farms Inc | Sacramento, CA 95834 | $41,587 |
146 | Samuel L Manes | Bieber, CA 96009 | $41,355 |
147 | Fonseca & Fonseca Inc | Walnut Grove, CA 95690 | $40,127 |
148 | John Wiedmann And Son | Walnut Grove, CA 95690 | $40,057 |
149 | Jerry Stribling | Galt, CA 95632 | $39,950 |
150 | Wallace Chan Farms Inc | Courtland, CA 95615 | $39,405 |
151 | , | $38,926 | |
152 | Fox Lee Orchards | Walnut Grove, CA 95690 | $38,840 |
153 | Valdemar Ferreira | Elk Grove, CA 95757 | $38,014 |
154 | The Nature Conservancy | Minneapolis, MN 55415 | $37,837 |
155 | Vincent Dedomenico | Napa, CA 94559 | $36,653 |
156 | Jeffrey J Jacobsen | Wilton, CA 95693 | $36,593 |
157 | Albert L Barcelos Jr | Elk Grove, CA 95757 | $35,401 |
158 | Julie J. Reinhardt | Sloughhouse, CA 95683 | $35,267 |
159 | Chavier Farming | Isleton, CA 95641 | $34,431 |
160 | Cristobal Alberto Espinosa | Galt, CA 95632 | $34,336 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”