Total Disaster Programs in Sacramento County, California, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 53
Recipients of Total Disaster Programs from farms in Sacramento County, California totaled $1,204,000 in in 2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Disaster Programs 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | All State Packers Inc | Lodi, CA 95241 | $125,000 |
| 2 | Grand Island Ranch LLC | Linden, CA 95236 | $125,000 |
| 3 | Kay Dix Inc | Walnut Grove, CA 95690 | $125,000 |
| 4 | Sutter River Ranch LLC | Linden, CA 95236 | $117,936 |
| 5 | Grand Delta Farms LLC | Linden, CA 95236 | $116,675 |
| 6 | Klm Ranches Inc | Elk Grove, CA 95757 | $113,874 |
| 7 | River Maid Land Co | Walnut Grove, CA 95690 | $66,124 |
| 8 | Jack Sparrowk | Clements, CA 95227 | $43,303 |
| 9 | J T Mccormack Inc | Walnut Grove, CA 95690 | $38,006 |
| 10 | Patrick Kirby | Wilton, CA 95693 | $36,956 |
| 11 | Wilson Land Co. Limited | Walnut Grove, CA 95690 | $26,566 |
| 12 | Van Vleck Ranch, LLC | Rancho Murieta, CA 95683 | $24,609 |
| 13 | Schneider Brown Ranch LLC | Sloughhouse, CA 95683 | $22,208 |
| 14 | Pamela Payen | Loyalton, CA 96118 | $19,740 |
| 15 | Mike Tudesko | Sloughhouse, CA 95683 | $19,391 |
| 16 | Gilliland Livestock Inc | Davis, CA 95618 | $18,427 |
| 17 | Denier Revocable Trust | Galt, CA 95632 | $15,682 |
| 18 | Tim J Lewis | Herald, CA 95638 | $13,760 |
| 19 | Mahon Family Partnership | Elk Grove, CA 95624 | $11,635 |
| 20 | Mike Johnson | Galt, CA 95632 | $11,589 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf