Dairy Programs in Sacramento County, California, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 97
Recipients of Dairy Programs from farms in Sacramento County, California totaled $13,489,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Dairy Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Van Steyn Dairy | Galt, CA 95632 | $1,315,189 |
2 | B & J Dairy Lp | Galt, CA 95632 | $684,794 |
3 | Van Warmerdam Dairy Inc | Galt, CA 95632 | $626,825 |
4 | Joe M Simoes & Sons Dairy | Elk Grove, CA 95757 | $598,948 |
5 | Tony Mello | Galt, CA 95632 | $584,928 |
6 | J & M Dairy | Elk Grove, CA 95757 | $560,551 |
7 | Pimentel Dairy | Elk Grove, CA 95757 | $508,355 |
8 | New Hope Dairy LLC | Galt, CA 95632 | $495,745 |
9 | Cal-denier Dairy LLC | Galt, CA 95632 | $477,040 |
10 | Luis A Pimentel Dairy | Elk Grove, CA 95757 | $323,457 |
11 | Maria Avis | Elk Grove, CA 95757 | $298,818 |
12 | Joe Vitoria Dairy | Galt, CA 95632 | $298,198 |
13 | Silva Bros Dairy | Acampo, CA 95220 | $292,963 |
14 | Fernando Cardoso | Galt, CA 95632 | $227,962 |
15 | Tollenaar Holsteins | Elk Grove, CA 95757 | $227,397 |
16 | Ernesto Moules | Herald, CA 95638 | $226,309 |
17 | Duarte Family Dairy Inc | Elk Grove, CA 95757 | $219,049 |
18 | De Melo Dairy | Galt, CA 95632 | $216,826 |
19 | Luis A Pimental Dairy | Elk Grove, CA 95757 | $213,652 |
20 | Pearson And Coupe, LLC | Galt, CA 95632 | $212,238 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>