Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) in Sacramento County, California, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 82
Recipients of Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) from farms in Sacramento County, California totaled $1,810,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Guy Rutter | Acampo, CA 95220 | $181,033 |
2 | Vitaliy Lyubasyuk | Orangevale, CA 95662 | $137,791 |
3 | Ivan Tatar | Sacramento, CA 95828 | $116,750 |
4 | Farm Services Agency ** | Langdon, ND 58249 | $116,750 |
5 | , | $89,729 | |
6 | Calvin West | Galt, CA 95632 | $85,312 |
7 | Vladimir Perevertaylo | Rio Linda, CA 95673 | $72,432 |
8 | , | $69,064 | |
9 | R Hall And Son Apiaries Inc | Davis, SD 57021 | $65,556 |
10 | Alexandr Perevertan | Rio Linda, CA 95673 | $60,470 |
11 | Aieksey Perevertan | Rio Linda, CA 95673 | $57,504 |
12 | Andrey Perevertaylo Bros Bee Keep | Sacramento, CA 95821 | $54,248 |
13 | , | $50,413 | |
14 | Jack Sparrowk | Clements, CA 95227 | $47,306 |
15 | , | $46,891 | |
16 | Patrick Kirby | Wilton, CA 95693 | $44,137 |
17 | Van Vleck Ranch, LLC | Rancho Murieta, CA 95683 | $34,816 |
18 | Cristobal Alberto Espinosa | Galt, CA 95632 | $34,336 |
19 | Schneider Brown Ranch LLC | Sloughhouse, CA 95683 | $30,033 |
20 | Stewart Jones | Rio Vista, CA 94571 | $29,843 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>