Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC) in Sacramento County, California, 2020
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 126
Recipients of Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC) from farms in Sacramento County, California totaled $995,000 in in 2020.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC) 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Gary Silva Sr | Herald, CA 95638 | $84,650 |
| 2 | Robert Hilarides | Visalia, CA 93292 | $66,854 |
| 3 | Sharon Hilarides | Visalia, CA 93292 | $52,263 |
| 4 | Stokes Farms | Lodi, CA 95242 | $47,406 |
| 5 | Myron Cabral | Rio Vista, CA 94571 | $45,931 |
| 6 | Mello Farms Inc | Walnut Grove, CA 95690 | $36,598 |
| 7 | Nakahara Farms Inc | Clarksburg, CA 95612 | $32,924 |
| 8 | Amistad Ranches | Courtland, CA 95615 | $29,662 |
| 9 | Klm Ranches Inc | Elk Grove, CA 95757 | $26,825 |
| 10 | Crescent Farming Company | Walnut Grove, CA 95690 | $26,367 |
| 11 | Hunn & Merwin & Merwin Inc | Clarksburg, CA 95612 | $22,276 |
| 12 | Wallace Chan Farms Inc | Courtland, CA 95615 | $22,272 |
| 13 | Gerald A Dinelli | Antioch, CA 94509 | $21,327 |
| 14 | Douglas Chan | Courtland, CA 95615 | $18,879 |
| 15 | Carla Chan | Courtland, CA 95615 | $18,879 |
| 16 | Tiessen And Waegell Ranch | Sacramento, CA 95830 | $17,913 |
| 17 | Lumar Dairy Farms | Turlock, CA 95380 | $17,820 |
| 18 | Dennis Katsuki | Isleton, CA 95641 | $17,468 |
| 19 | Wackman Ranch | Elk Grove, CA 95757 | $17,258 |
| 20 | Taj Silva Farms LLC | Acampo, CA 95220 | $16,356 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf