Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 in San Diego County, California, 2020
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 121
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 from farms in San Diego County, California totaled $8,514,000 in in 2020.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Mellano Enterprises Inc | Los Angeles, CA 90014 | $750,000 |
| 2 | Sunlet Nursery Inc | Fallbrook, CA 92028 | $500,000 |
| 3 | Grandon Ranch Corp | Valley Center, CA 92082 | $448,834 |
| 4 | Mountain Meadow Mushroom Farms In | Escondido, CA 92026 | $349,000 |
| 5 | William Arterberry Dba Farm Acw | Fallbrook, CA 92028 | $250,000 |
| 6 | Valdivia Farms Inc | Carlsbad, CA 92008 | $250,000 |
| 7 | D&e Propegators Inc Dba Fox Point | Encinitas, CA 92024 | $250,000 |
| 8 | San Diego Growers Inc | Fallbrook, CA 92028 | $250,000 |
| 9 | West Coast Tomato Growers Inc | Oceanside, CA 92057 | $250,000 |
| 10 | Borrego Farms Inc | Valley Center, CA 92082 | $250,000 |
| 11 | Rainforest Flora Inc | Torrance, CA 90503 | $236,429 |
| 12 | Resendiz Brothers Protea Growers | Fallbrook, CA 92028 | $218,375 |
| 13 | Frank Konyn Dairy, Inc | Escondido, CA 92027 | $207,425 |
| 14 | Be Wise Ranch Inc | Escondido, CA 92025 | $193,995 |
| 15 | Sun Grown Organic Distributors | San Diego, CA 92154 | $187,997 |
| 16 | Upper Group Inc. | El Cajon, CA 92021 | $180,360 |
| 17 | Fluegge Egg Ranch 2 Inc | Escondido, CA 92027 | $178,047 |
| 18 | Witman Ranch Inc | Escondido, CA 92033 | $177,072 |
| 19 | Witman Ranch Inc & Arlington Heights Citrus Co Inc | Escondido, CA 92033 | $171,161 |
| 20 | Harold Investments Lp Dba Morning | Valley Center, CA 92082 | $168,200 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf