Trade Adjustment Assistance for Farmers Program (TAAF) in San Joaquin County, California, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 17 of 17
Recipients of Trade Adjustment Assistance for Farmers Program (TAAF) from farms in San Joaquin County, California totaled $196,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Trade Adjustment Assistance for Farmers Program (TAAF) 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Mizuno Resources Inc | Tracy, CA 95304 | $12,060 |
2 | Robert Silva | Modesto, CA 95356 | $12,040 |
3 | Lory Mussi | Stockton, CA 95206 | $12,032 |
4 | Rudy Mussi | Stockton, CA 95206 | $12,032 |
5 | Richard Marchini | Stockton, CA 95206 | $12,000 |
6 | Thomas J Sarale Jr | Stockton, CA 95206 | $12,000 |
7 | William A Toso | Stockton, CA 95212 | $12,000 |
8 | Bruno & Rosetta Marchini Inter Vi | Stockton, CA 95206 | $12,000 |
9 | Vincent Marchini | Stockton, CA 95206 | $12,000 |
10 | David Nuss | Lodi, CA 95240 | $12,000 |
11 | Sarale Farms Inc | Stockton, CA 95206 | $12,000 |
12 | Golden R Inc | Stockton, CA 95206 | $12,000 |
13 | Kelly A Nuss | Lodi, CA 95240 | $12,000 |
14 | Rdc Farms-dino Del Carlo Venture | Stockton, CA 95206 | $12,000 |
15 | Marc Marchini Separate Property T | Stockton, CA 95206 | $12,000 |
16 | Marchini Family Trust 12-9-93 | Stockton, CA 95206 | $12,000 |
17 | Ferguson Farms Inc | Stockton, CA 95207 | $4,000 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”