Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 in San Luis Obispo County, California, 2020
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 436
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 from farms in San Luis Obispo County, California totaled $15,194,000 in in 2020.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 21 | Cal Coast Orchids | Los Osos, CA 93402 | $235,823 |
| 22 | Cagliero Vineyards Inc | Paso Robles, CA 93446 | $200,894 |
| 23 | Pacific Sun Growers Greenhouses, | Nipomo, CA 93444 | $178,303 |
| 24 | Jeanette Holder-bartleson | Arroyo Grande, CA 93420 | $177,518 |
| 25 | Armando Gonzalez | Nipomo, CA 93444 | $177,375 |
| 26 | Massey Bourdet Livestock | San Miguel, CA 93451 | $176,220 |
| 27 | Lilian L Massey | San Miguel, CA 93451 | $169,455 |
| 28 | Michael Massey | San Miguel, CA 93451 | $149,900 |
| 29 | Benchmark Vineyard Management Inc | Paso Robles, CA 93447 | $142,810 |
| 30 | The Ernest Righetti Corp | San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 | $119,493 |
| 31 | Four Sisters Ranch LLC | Paso Robles, CA 93446 | $113,991 |
| 32 | Massey Davis Livestock | Templeton, CA 93465 | $112,090 |
| 33 | Forest Nurseries Inc | Los Osos, CA 93402 | $105,614 |
| 34 | Morro Ranch Company LLC | Templeton, CA 93465 | $103,293 |
| 35 | Don Michael Dusi | Templeton, CA 93465 | $99,717 |
| 36 | Waltercrest Vineyards LLC | San Miguel, CA 93451 | $99,003 |
| 37 | Filipe Ranch | Arroyo Grande, CA 93420 | $96,144 |
| 38 | Helen Crowther | Cambria, CA 93428 | $94,487 |
| 39 | Twisselman Grain And Cattle | Shandon, CA 93461 | $94,380 |
| 40 | S & A Vineyards LLC Dba Cass Vine | Paso Robles, CA 93446 | $93,992 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf