Tree Assistance Program in San Luis Obispo County, California, 1995-2021

Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 72

Recipients of Tree Assistance Program from farms in San Luis Obispo County, California totaled $3,863,000 in from 1995-2021.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Tree Assistance Program
1995-2021
1Cagliero Vineyards IncPaso Robles, CA 93446$415,508
2Margarita Vineyards LLCSanta Margarita, CA 93453$314,012
3Richard J Woodland SrPaso Robles, CA 93446$233,000
4Erich L RussellPaso Robles, CA 93446$187,859
5Joseph C CarrascoPaso Robles, CA 93446$176,525
6Saunders Vineyard LLCPaso Robles, CA 93446$146,834
7Erich Lee RussellPaso Robles, CA 93446$116,500
8Boneso Family Vineyard LpPaso Robles, CA 93446$116,500
9Boneso Vineyards LLCPaso Robles, CA 93446$116,500
10Don J LindstromPaso Robles, CA 93446$104,562
11Bottom Line Ranch LpSanta Margarita, CA 93453$103,407
12Daou Vineyards LLCPaso Robles, CA 93446$95,659
13Wellsona Vineyards LLCTempleton, CA 93465$94,378
14Flight Investment LLCPaso Robles, CA 93446$89,275
15Serine-cannonau Vineyard CorpPaso Robles, CA 93446$80,487
16Steinbeck Vineyards 2 LLCPaso Robles, CA 93446$67,579
17Waltercrest Vineyards LLCSan Miguel, CA 93451$65,821
18Patricia Diane Vineyards LpPaso Robles, CA 93446$61,244
19John CrosslandPaso Robles, CA 93446$60,766
20Robert J Krivacek Twin Fawns VineSan Miguel, CA 93451$51,832

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag