Total Conservation Programs in San Luis Obispo County, California, 1995-2021

Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 478

Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in San Luis Obispo County, California totaled $61,294,000 in from 1995-2021.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Total Conservation Programs
1995-2021
41Frances D Kuhnle Living TrustShandon, CA 93461$416,867
42Laura Coats TrustCreston, CA 93432$411,869
43Pamela Aldrich RowanFresno, CA 93720$395,826
44Junis TwisselmanShandon, CA 93461$391,663
45Mary N JonesBrea, CA 92821$384,370
46Patricia TwisselmanShandon, CA 93461$383,193
47Ernst Family TrustPaso Robles, CA 93446$370,285
48William & Doris Mouren RevocableCoalinga, CA 93210$367,027
49Ian Irving Mcmillan IIShandon, CA 93461$361,260
50Mysterious 1992 Living Trust Aka Cole RowanFresno, CA 93720$361,222
51Caroline EngSan Antonio, TX 78229$355,567
52Mark MorrisonSanta Margarita, CA 93453$338,699
53Violet ErnstPaso Robles, CA 93446$334,994
54Pinole Land & CattleSanta Margarita, CA 93453$324,918
55Cindy SwitzerPaso Robles, CA 93446$323,552
56Robert PritchardSan Francisco, CA 94116$320,475
57W R Land & Cattle CoRancho Palos Verdes, CA 90275$314,582
58Filipponi Family TrustCreston, CA 93432$311,179
59Jaureguy Land Trust Dated December 29 1995San Miguel, CA 93451$306,402
60Timothy TestermanPaso Robles, CA 93446$305,718

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

<< Previous | Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag